Academic Wikipedia Page

Academic Wikipedia Page

Academic Wikipedia PageWelcome to Hire Wikipedia Editor Services. This page is about Academic Wikipedia Page Creation Services offered by Hire Wikipedia Editor. This page will explain to you everything related to your Academic Wikipedia Page Creation and Publication. When it comes to Wikipedia, then we need to understand that Wikipedia is Complete dependent on its policies and guidelines. So, it is important to understand Academic Wikipedia Notability for creating and Publishing an Academic related Wikipedia page.

Academics Notability Guidelines

Academic Wikipedia Page: This guideline reflects an agreement about the notability of academics as calculated by their academic achievements. an educational is someone engaged in scholarly research or higher education; academic notability refers to being known for such engagement.

  • Many academics are faculty members (such as professors) at colleges or universities. Also, many academics have held research positions at academic research associations (such as NIH, CNRS, etc.). However, academics might also work outside academia and their primary job doesn’t must be academic if they’re known for his or her academic achievements. Conversely, if they’re notable for his or her primary job, they are doing not must be notable academics to warrant writing.
  • School teachers at the educational activity level, sometimes also called professors, don’t seem to be presumed to be academics. they will only be considered academics for the needs of this guideline if they’re engaged in substantial scholarly research and are known for such research. If not, they’re evaluated by the standard rules for notability in their profession.
  • See the professor for more information about academic ranks and their meanings. Note that academic ranks are different in several countries.

Academic Wikipedia Page: This guideline is autonomous of the opposite subject-specific notability guidelines, like WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:AUTH, etc., and is specially listed as another to the final notability guideline. it’s possible for education to not be notable under the provisions of this guideline but to be notable in another way under the final notability guideline or one amongst the opposite subject-specific notability guidelines. Conversely, failure to fulfil either the final notability guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant if an educational is notable under this guideline.Academic Wikipedia Page Creation Services

Criteria for Page

Academic Wikipedia Page: Academics meeting anybody of the subsequent conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics meeting none of those conditions should still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:BIO or other notability criteria. The merits of a piece on the educational will depend largely on the extent to which it’s verifiable. Before applying these criteria, see the final notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.

  1. The person’s research has had a major impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
  2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honour at a national or international level.
  3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a serious scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honour (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).
  4. The person’s academic work has made a major impact within the area of upper education, affecting a considerable number of educational institutions.
  5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a serious institution of upper education and research, or the same position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
  6. The person has held the highest-level elected or appointed an administrative post at a serious academic institution or major academic society.
  7. The person has had a considerable impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
  8. The person has been the top or chief editor of a serious, well-established academic journal in their field of study.Hire Wikipedia Editor

General Notes For Academic Wikipedia

  • An article’s assertion that the topic passes this guideline isn’t sufficient. Every topic on Wikipedia must have sources that suit Wikipedia:Verifiability. Major awards must be confirmed, claims of impact must be substantiated by independent statements, reviews, citation metrics, or library holdings, and so on.
  • Once the passage of 1 or more notability criteria has been verified through independent sources, or through the reliable sources listed explicitly for this purpose within the specific criteria notes, non-independent sources, like official institutional and professional sources, are widely accepted as reliable sourcing for routine, uncontroversial details.
  • The criteria above are sometimes summed up as an “Average Professor Test”: When judged against the typical impact of a researcher in a very given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more accomplished?
  • Note that this is often a tenet and not a rule; exceptions may exist. Some academics might not meet any of those criteria, but should be notable for his or her academic work. it’s very difficult to form clear requirements in terms of the number/quality of publications. the factors, in practice, vary greatly by field and are determined by precedent and consensus. Also, this guideline sets the bar fairly low, which is natural; to a degree, academics sleep in the general public arena, trying to influence others with their ideas. Naturally, successful ones should be considered notable.

Most Specific Criteria Notes

1. The person’s research has made a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.

  • See also notes to Criterion 2, some of which apply to Criterion 1 as well.
  • The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person’s work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account.
    • To count towards satisfying Criterion 1, citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books.
    • In some disciplines, there are review publications that review virtually all refereed publications in that discipline. For example, in mathematics, Mathematical Reviews, also known as MathSciNet, and Zentralblatt MATH fall into that category. The mere fact that an article or a book is reviewed in such a publication does not serve towards satisfying Criterion 1. However, the content of the review and any evaluative comments made there may be used for that purpose.Academic Wikipedia Page 1
    • Generally, more experimental and applied subjects tend to have higher publication and citation rates than more theoretical ones. Publication and citation rates in humanities are generally lower than in sciences. Also, in sciences, most new original research is published in journals and conference proceedings whereas in humanities book publications tend to play a larger role (and are harder to count without access to offline libraries). The meaning of “a substantial number of publications” and “high citation rates” is to be interpreted in line with the interpretations used by major research institutions in determining the qualifications for the awarding of tenure.
  • Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline. In this case, it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is widely attributed to the person in question.Expert Advisor Wikipedia
  • The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses.
  • Other considerations may be used as contributing factors (usually not sufficient individually) towards satisfying Criterion 1: significant academic awards and honours (see below); service on editorial boards of scholarly publications; publications in especially prestigious and selective academic journals; publication of collected works; special conferences dedicated to honour academic achievements of a particular person; naming of academic awards or lecture series after a particular person; and others.
  • To partially satisfy Criterion 1, significant academic awards and honours may include, for example, major academic awards (they would also automatically satisfy Criterion 2), highly selective fellowships (other than postdoctoral fellowships); invited lectures at meetings of national or international scholarly societies, were giving such an invited lecture is considered considerably more prestigious than giving an invited lecture at typical national and international conferences in that discipline; named lectures or named lecture series; awards by notable academics and scholarly societies; honorary degrees; and others. Ordinary colloquia and seminar talks and invited lectures at scholarly conferences, standard research grants, named post-doctoral fellowships, visiting appointments, or internal university awards are insufficient for this purpose.
  • To satisfy Criterion 1, the academic discipline of the person in question needs to be sufficiently broadly construed. Major disciplines, such as physics, mathematics, history, political science, or their significant subdisciplines (e.g., particle physics, algebraic geometry, medieval history, fluid mechanics, Drosophila genetics are valid examples). Overly narrow and highly specialized categories should be avoided. Arguing that someone is an expert in an extremely narrow area of study is, in and of itself, not necessarily sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1, except for the actual leaders in those subjects.
  • Simply having authored a large number of published academic works is not considered sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1.
  • Having an object (asteroid, process, manuscript, etc.) named after the subject is not in itself indicative of satisfying Criterion 1.
  • Having a small collaboration distance from a famous or notable academic (e.g., having a small Erdős number) is not, in and of itself, indicative of satisfying Criterion 1.Hire Wikipedia Writer

2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honour at a national or international level.

  • For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel PrizeMacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2. Some less significant academic honours and awards that confer a high level of academic prestige can also be used to satisfy Criterion 2. Examples may include certain awards, honours, and prizes of notable academic societies, of notable foundations and trusts (e.g., the Guggenheim FellowshipLinguapax Prize), etc. Significant academic awards and honours can also be used to partially satisfy Criterion 1 (see item 4 above in this section).
  • For documents that a person has won a specific award (but not for a judgment of whether or not that award is prestigious), publications of the awarding institution are considered a reliable source.
  • Victories in academic student competitions at the high school and university level as well as other awards and honours for academic student achievements (at either high school, undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify under Criterion 2 and do not count towards partially satisfying Criterion 1.
  • Biographical listings in and awards from vanity press publishers, such as the American Biographical Institute, or from publications incorporating a substantial vanity press element in their business model, such as Marquis Who’s Who, do not qualify for satisfying Criterion 2 or for partially satisfying Criterion 1.Wiki Writers For Hire

3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honour (e.g., the IEEE).

  • For Criterion 3, elected memberships in minor and non-notable societies are insufficient (most newly formed societies fall into that category).
  • For documents that a person has been elected member or fellow (but not for a judgment of whether or not that membership/fellowship is prestigious), publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source.

4. The person’s academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.

  • Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education.

5. The person has held a named chair appointment or “Distinguished Professor” appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon).

  • For documents that a person has held such an appointment (but not for a judgment of whether or not the institution is a major one), publications of the appointing institution are considered a reliable source.
  • Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level, and not for junior faculty members with endowed appointments.
  • Major institutions, for these purposes, are those that have a reputation for excellence or selectivity. Named chairs at other institutions are not necessarily sufficient to establish notability.

6. The person has held the highest-level elected or appointed an administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.

  • For documents that a person has held such a post (but not for a judgment of whether or not the institution or society is a major one), publications of the institution where the post is held are considered a reliable source.
  • Criterion 6 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has held the post of president or chancellor (or vice-chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university, director of a highly regarded, notable academic independent research institute or centre (which is not a part of a university), president of a notable national or international scholarly society, etc.
  • Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean, department chair, etc.) are generally not sufficient to qualify under Criterion 6 alone, although exceptions are possible on a case-by-case basis (e.g., being a Provost of a major university may sometimes qualify).
  • Heads of institutes and centres devoted to promoting pseudo-science and marginal or fringe theories are generally not covered by Criterion 6; they may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general WP:BIO or WP:N guidelines.Wikipedia Experts For Hire

7. The person has made a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.

  • Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark.
  • Criterion 7 may also be satisfied if the person has authored widely popular general audience books on academic subjects provided the author is widely regarded inside academia as a well-established academic expert and provided the books deal with that expert’s field of study. Books on pseudo-science and marginal or fringe scientific theories are generally not covered by this criterion; their authors may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general WP:BIO or WP:N guidelines.
  • Patents, commercial and financial applications are generally not indicative of satisfying Criterion 7.

8. The person has been head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.

  • For documents that a person has held such a position (but not for a judgment of whether or not the journal is a major well-established one), publications of the journal or its publishers are considered a reliable source.
  • Journals dedicated to promoting pseudo-science and marginal or fringe theories are generally not covered by Criterion 8. However, their head editor may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general WP:BIO or WP:N guidelines.

Academic Wikipedia Page 2

Citation Metrics for Wikipedia Academic Page

Academic Wikipedia Page: The only reasonably accurate way of finding citations to journal articles in most subjects is to use one of the two major citation indexes, Web of Knowledge and Scopus. Scopus covers the sciences and the social sciences, but is very incomplete before 1996; Web of Knowledge may cover the sciences back to 1900, the social sciences back to 1956, and the humanities (very incompletely) back to 1975, but only the largest universities can afford the entire set. (Fortunately, additional citation indexes with public access are being developed.) These databases are furthermore incomplete, especially for the less developed countries.

Academic Wikipedia Page: Additionally, they list citations only from journal articles – citations from articles published in books or other publications are not included. For that reason, these databases should be used with caution for disciplines such as computer science in which conference or other non-journal publication is essential, or humanistic disciplines where book publication is most important. Web of Knowledge provides a free index of highly cited researchers, which may be of some value. In individual scientific fields, MathSciNetSciFinder Scholar (Chemical Abstracts), and similar disciplinary indexes are also valuable resources, often specifically listing citation counts, but access to them is also not free and usually requires a university computer account.

  • A caution about Google Scholar: Google Scholar works well for fields where all (or nearly all) respected venues have an online presence. Most papers written by a computer scientist will show up, but for less technologically up-to-date fields, it is dicey. For non-scientific subjects, it is especially dicey. Even the journal Science puts articles online only back to 1996. Many journals, additionally, do not permit Google Scholar to list their articles. For books, the coverage in Google Scholar is partly through Google Book Search and is very strongly influenced by the publisher’s permissions and policies. Thus, the absence of references in Google Scholar should not be used as proof of non-notability. In the other direction, GS includes sources that are not peer-reviewed, such as academic web sites and other self-published sources.[2] It has also been criticized for not vetting journals and including predatory journals. Thus, the number of citations found there can sometimes be significantly more than the number of actual citations from truly reliable scholarly material. In essence, it is a rough guide only.
  • A caution about PubMedMedline, now usually accessed as part of PubMed, is a well-established broadly based search engine, covering much of biology and all of medicine, published since 1967 and sometimes even earlier. It includes a few journals in medically related clinical subjects but is not complete in those. Further, not all articles in PubMed are from peer-reviewed journals, as it includes medical news sources of varying degrees of quality, including such items in peer-reviewed journals it does cover. It also exhaustively covers letters to the editor and similar material, not all of which is of any significance.
  • A caution about “related articles”: In PubMed, and most other databases, “related articles” are not articles that necessarily cite the original; they are articles on the same general topic, usually selected by having title words or citations in common. Some may cite the original (and some do not, for they will have been published before the articles in question). They are useful for finding additional papers on a subject, which is the purpose for which they were designed. The only way to count citations using such a listing in, for example, PubMed, is the tedious method of looking at every one of the related articles published after the article in question, finding its “cited article” display, and check if it is there. (Some PubMed records do not list cited articles, for a variety of reasons.) Nor will such a listing necessarily include all the citations. – Help for “Related articles” featureAcademic Wikipedia Page Publishing Services
  • Citation measures such as the h-indexg-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.
  • For scholars in humanities, the existing citation indices and GoogleScholar often provide inadequate and incomplete information. In these cases, one can also look at how widely the person’s books are held in various academic libraries (this information is available in Worldcat) when evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied.
  • A report from the association of European computer science departments lists ten bullet points for evaluation of computer science research, two of which emphasize the importance of non-journal publication and one of which specifically cautions against the use of Web of Science: Meyer, Bertrand; Choppy, Christine; Staunstrup, Jørgen; van Leeuwen, Jan (2009), “Research Evaluation for Computer Science”Communications of the ACM52 (4): 31–34, DOI:10.1145/1498765.1498780. Instead, it recommends Google scholar or Citeseer for this field.

Get in Touch

Academic Wikipedia Page: This was all from Academic Wikipedia Page notability guidelines. Now We will discuss the importance of Academic Wikipedia Pages, Why you should create your Academy Wikipedia page?, Why you should choose Hire Wikipedia Writer for your academic Wikipedia page. If you are looking from Wikipedia Experts for Hire, Wiki Writers for Hire, Hire Wikipedia Writer and Expert Advisor Wikipedia feels free to get in touch with us. Also, see our other services feel free to ask about us.

Importance of Academic Wikipedia Page

Academic Wikipedia Page: Significance of Wikipedia; What more will be asked for when a selected platform not only acts as an accumulator of the planet’s data but is additionally reachable and accessible to the world, irrespective of distinguishing languages. Thus, legion articles written by thousands of registered volunteers on Wikipedia are available in additional than 270 languages, thanks to the editors working for wiki who are simultaneously editing and translating every text into different international and regional languages making it more convenient for people to induce the specified information in multiple languages.

Putting it straight, Wikipedia has progressively been adopted as a compendium of data that has enabled the collaboration of technology and encyclopedias, delivering data during a mass quantity round the globe.

Academic Wikipedia Page:  Pros of Wikipedia Page; The majority of individual or strategic decisions are followed by in-depth and detailed research on a selected subject. This research is supported by the utilization of search engines which help to extract the specified relevant information, namely Google.

Academic Wikipedia Page: Hence, regardless of what the topic or content is, Wikipedia is undoubted, the first online resource that ranks high-up on every program, it permits you to search from a way to decorate your house to a way to get your nails done, from a way to create an internet form to a way to submit your online responses, the wiki has this all for you. you’ll be able to even ask wiki to assist you together with your innovative business idea or how you’d find the foremost innovative ideas.

Therefore, when the favoured Google, Bing or Yahoo search engines are used for digging out the specified information, Wikipedia is going to be the primary and foremost source that will be ranked high above other resources.

Academic Wikipedia Page: With editions of errors or omissions in every minute, Wikipedia, inarguably, stands because of the most reliable and authentic online source of data that supply’s data in massive quantities.

Academic Wikipedia Page: Its significance and strengths are noteworthy because it has the potential to produce speedy coverage and delivery of any news, event, personality and particularly any subject. it’s the flexibility to create any subject or content accessible and noticeable to the planet where other resources may well be inaccessible. It teaches a way to be a technology freak or how you’ll be able to create a Wikipedia page for an individual or submit your page to Wikipedia to become famous in barely some days.

Additionally, anyone can depend on its objectivity and reliability and reconfirm the sources cited on the wiki page, one can always go and edit or update the previously available information by simply rummaging an easy login process.

Academic Wikipedia Page: Shortly, Wikipedia is an internet encyclopedia where you’ll be able to find anything and everything. But the sole difference is that you just yourself can go and edit the updated information and always submit it to the wiki.

Thus, be it any research for any purpose, material or topic, Wikipedia never disappoints its users and assures to air top of each program.

Wikipedia Editors for Hire

Academic Wikipedia Page: Wikipedia is an exigent platform. Editing on that requires adherence to complex rules that are imprecise and contradictory. Monitoring it necessitates constant vigilance since anyone can change your page. The editorial discussions tend to impose on tolerance. Yet, can a brand – personal or corporate – bear to own strangers or competitors editing their profile? When the highest result on Google search is Wikipedia, the solution could be a succinct negative. One has to keep the page in sterling condition and free from vandalism, in the slightest degree times.

Academic Wikipedia Page: At Facilius Inc., we handle the task of editing your Wikipedia page, we monitor each profile, track the modifications made and reverse them when needed. Through the employment of technology, our editors supervise a page 24 hours daily, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. Immediate alerts make us cognizant of edits made on a page. An editor then re-evaluates the alterations. If the edits aren’t factual or damaging to the brand’s image, we reverse the changes.

Academic Wikipedia Page: Our veteran editors know that Wikipedia can influence infinitely more users than an internet site. The labour and toil to inform your story, accurately. Be it a business, a notable entity, a non-profit or personal, Facilius editors protect every online reputation while abiding by the stringent rules of Wikipedia.

Why Choose US

Academic Wikipedia Page: If you’re trying to find the explanations to contemplate us as your Wikipedia contributors here are some reasons why we are the most effective within the market.

Quality services

Academic Wikipedia Page: Wikipedia is an exigent platform. Editing on that requires adherence to complex rules that are imprecise and contradictory. Monitoring it necessitates constant vigilance since anyone can change your page. The editorial discussions tend to impose on tolerance. Yet, can a brand – personal or corporate – bear to own strangers or competitors editing their profile? When the highest result on Google search is Wikipedia, the solution could be a succinct negative. One has to keep the page in sterling condition and free from vandalism, in the slightest degree times.

Best and experienced experts on board

Academic Wikipedia Page: At Facilius Inc., we handle the task of editing your Wikipedia page, we monitor each profile, track the modifications made and reverse them when needed. Through the employment of technology, our editors supervise a page 24 hours daily, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. Immediate alerts make us cognizant of edits made on a page. An editor then re-evaluates the alterations. If the edits aren’t factual or damaging to the brand’s image, we reverse the changes.

Affordable Rates

Academic Wikipedia Page: Our veteran editors know that Wikipedia can influence infinitely more users than an internet site. The labour and toil to inform your story, accurately. Be it a business, a notable entity, a non-profit or personal, Facilius editors protect every online reputation while abiding by the stringent rules of Wikipedia.

Feels free to get in touch with us to hire a professional Wikipedia Editor, You can also contact us through email address hirewikipediaeditor@gmail.com or Info@hirewikipediaeditor.com Our WhatsApp number +923361112311. You can contact us 24/7 our experts are always available to guide you about the services of Wikipedia.

Open chat